July 22nd, 2008 | BY Jep Castelein

Luxury bank struggles to make website just as luxurious

Jep Castelein

The Financial Brand writes about Goldwater Bank’s new website, which is a reflection of Goldwater’s upscale image. Their branch offices look more like posh hotel lobbies than the usual slightly run-down brownish interiors of many other banks. The article mentions Goldwater’s luxury offline amenities like concierge and couriers. So let’s take a closer look at their new website, and see whether it provides the same luxury experience.

First of all, the look of the website is pretty good. It looks somewhat like a hotel, because it shows a picture of the lobby, and it has a prominent link to a virtual tour. So they definitely succeed in promoting their in-bank services. How much online service can you expect from a bank that probably has a limited in-house IT staff? Let’s take a quick look at the home page, online forms and online banking.

Home page

The home page does not include any type of value proposition, just pictures. I personally believe some kind of promotion is useful, especially for people who have never visited a branch office. The moving navigation bar is not very easy to use: visitors have to be pretty good with the mouse to hit the right button. Also, the background music can be annoying, especially since I didn’t find out how to switch it off. Additionally, it would be useful to see where they are based. I would expect a tagline like “Lifestyle Banking in Scottsdale, Arizona”. Also, they might want to invest a little in search engine optimization, because currently only the front page is indexed, and that doesn’t contain any text. So I admire the concept, but feel the execution is lacking.

Application Forms

It’s very good that the ‘apply online’ button is prominently placed on the home page. There are various applications behind this button, some are PDF, and some are forms hosted on a third party website: theformsgroup.net. These forms look very “2001”, just like the copyright statement on the website of the Forms Group. I’m a big proponent of software as a service, and it’s probably the right decision for a small bank. I wonder if other vendors provide forms that deliver a better user experience: does anybody know such vendors?

They also have their own forms; however, the apply-for-a-loan form gives a ‘page not found’ error, which is obviously not a good thing.

Online Banking

I’m not able to login to the actual online banking system, but I assume they are using some kind of off-the-shelf software, because it is very costly to develop your own online banking system. I’ve recently looked at Jwaala, and they have an impressive offering for small banks: see their screenshots. They provide an attractive online banking system that connects to various core banking systems. Regarding Goldwater: they should also revamp their online banking login page: it looks like it hasn’t been changed in over ten years. It even has promo buttons for Netscape 4 and Internet Explorer 4 (released in 1997).

Summary

The Financial Brand weblog is pretty positive about the new Goldwater site. And at first sight I agree. However, in my opinion it doesn’t go beyond pretty pictures. I don’t think it’s a matter of spending more money: it’s really about smart use of 3rd party tools such as Jwaala which make it much more cost-effective for small banks to offer a large-bank online customer experience. What is your take? Can we expect small banks to have a really cool and functional website? Or is that only possible for the bigger banks?

Trackbacks/Pings ( Trackback URL )


Comments ( RSS )

Great Blog post. I am going to bookmark and read more often. I love the Blog template

I’d say I’m more enthusiastic about the overall brand. It’s tightly integrated around a singular audience.

Goldwater’s brand is focused, which is rare in financial services. The best most banks can do is drill down to “people ages 25-55, skewing slightly towards women.” Ummm, you mean people in general, right? It’s what I call LCD disease - always trying to appeal to the lowest common denominator.

I agree that the landing page for online banking belies the rest of the Goldwater experience. There were a few readers of my site however who took the online banking demo Goldwater offers and they thought it was pretty slick.

Overall, I’d say the website is on-brand for Goldwater. Usability may be a different issue, but my guess is this: Goldwater customers probably aren’t trolling the website all that often. Maybe once or twice. They probably have a direct number (or two) for Goldwater bankers in their cell phones.

New Goldwater customers are almost certainly WOM referrals, so I’m not too concerned about the impact the site will have on the acquisition process. The rich dude pops in, snoops around a little, says, “Yep, this looks like me,” then calls to make an appointment.

Jep Castelein Says:

Hi Jeffry, thanks for your comment. I definitely see your point too. I know wealthy people who would appreciate this type of personal service, and they are “phone people” who call the bank rather than login online. I also know wealthy people who always want the best deal and use services that provide the best value for money, often online-only services. Goldwater is better suited for the first group.

On this blog we look into online usability and customer engagement, so I did a quick review of the Goldwater website. According to a Pew report, people making $100k+ are more than twice as likely to use online banking as people making $25-40k a year (http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/237/report_display.asp). So I do believe that online services targeting wealthy people can be successful, but this will probably be totally different from Goldwater’s concept. For example, I’m thinking of http://www.firstagain.com

Leigh Says:

That login page form the 90’s really makes me worry about the level of security on the site as well.

Leave a Reply